The
              Wife of a Former Protestant Pastor Speaks Out
         Patricia Dixon 
        Patricia Dixon is a freelance writer and the mother of four. Her
            husband was a Protestant pastor before the family entered the Catholic
            Church. 
        Why A Married Priesthood Won't Remedy the Priest Shortage 
        Would the Church be better served if priests were married? Those who
          propose lifting the celibacy requirement claim that this change would
          bring about a great increase in vocations, would provide parishes with
          priests who better understand the problems of family life, would make
          the priests themselves happier, and would generally improve the Church
          all around. It sounds lovely. But the advocates of a married clergy
          need to give a little more thought to the real consequences of their
          blithe slogans. Perhaps they will listen to a wife who has been there. 
        Let us consider a typical, moderately large parish in an affluent
          American community, in which three priests live in a rectory that also
          houses the parish office. What changes would have to be made if the
          priests of this parish were married? 
        First, there would have to be many more priests at the parish. A celibate
          man can give all his time to the parish; a married man must give priority
          to his family. So these three priests must become five or six, leaving
          the "priest shortage" right where it was, even if the removal
          of the celibacy rule doubles the number of priests in America. 
        But that's only the beginning. The stipend of a priest is nowhere
          near enough to support a family; it's not even half enough. The salary
          of a married priest would have to be about three times the current
          stipend in order to keep a priest's family 
        above the federal poverty line. (Would young men flock to the priesthood
          so they can support their families in near-poverty?) If the parish
          does not want the priest and his family to be the poorest family in
          the neighborhood, probably unable to afford even to send their children
          to the parish school, the salary would have to be higher still. Now
          figure in health insurance premiums for a wife and several children
          per priest. 
        And, of course, those six families can't all live in that rectory,
          and the parish offices can't be in the home of just one of them. So
          we now need six houses, and extra space somewhere else, to replace
          the one rectory. If the priests are expected to furnish their own housing,
          their salary will have to be increased even more. 
        Thus, supporting married priests will cost that three-priest parish
          more than six times what it now spends to support its priests. Does
          any parish consider itself that affluent? Is the average parishioner
          willing to multiply his offering by six? In all likelihood, the priests
          will have to work outside the priesthood to bring in income. Of course,
          their time for the parish and parishioners will decrease. So the parishioners,
          even if they could somehow support their six priests, would still find
          themselves short of priestly attention. 
        The financial burden is one thing, but there is also a very heavy
          emotional burden to be borne by priests - and their families. One hears
          the argument that "Protestant ministers can marry, and it works
          well for them," but the fact is that it doesn't work well. How
          many of the advocates of a married priesthood are truly aware of the
          struggles of a Protestant clergyman's family? 
        Every married pastor faces, throughout his career, the tension between
          the needs of the church and the needs of his family. Some find ways
          to resolve it to their satisfaction; most do not. Both church and family
          require more than half of a man's time and energy. Both can be demanding;
          and churches, which generally have no interest in a pastor's emotional
          health, are particularly demanding. The effects of this tension show
          up in families in various ways. Some wives - and many children - of
          pastors blame the church for depriving them of husband or father and
          leave the church, and even Christianity, altogether. One pastor said
          he expected his tombstone to read "Daddy's Gone to Another Meeting. " Another
          came home from a trip to find that his young son didn't even know he
          had been away - he was home so rarely anyway. Many a pastor's wife
          considers herself the next thing to a single parent. 
        On top of this, a pastor's wife and children are themselves without
          pastoral care. No man, however talented or dedicated, can be pastor
          and husband or father to the same people. The objectivity required
          of the pastoral role is missing. But the minister's family cannot seek
          spiritual direction and sustenance elsewhere; loyalty and the need
          to avoid the appearance of a split in the family require that they
          remain at his church. When the father's career and the family's spiritual
          life are one and the same, the spiritual life suffers badly. 
        A priest or minister is seldom off duty. Any family activity is likely
          to be interrupted, often for the most trivial of reasons. A vacation
          at home is impossible for a clergyman's family; if he's around, he's
          assumed to be available to his flock. The bum-out rate among Protestant
          pastors is very high. If relaxing the celibacy rule increases the number
          of priests, it will have to increase it enough to make up for the large
          number who will leave the priesthood when they, like so many of their
          Protestant colleagues, find the toll it takes on the families impossible
          to accept. 
        Or if a priest's wife leaves him, and the priest wants to continue
          functioning as a priest, what is the bishop supposed to do? Pretend
          everything is fine? What sort of message would that send? Would many
          parishioners be scandalized? Would others feel they now have permission
          to dump their spouses? And how well would any of them be pastored by
          the priest going through this private anguish? Or should the bishop
          quietly and quickly ship the priest (and his children?) off to a remote
          outpost in the diocese, hoping no one will be the wiser? This tactic
          has not won the hearts of Catholics where the problem has been pedophilia
          or some other violation of the vow of celibacy. 
        Or should the priest be laicized? Many would see this as the only
          solution that fully honors the sacrament of Holy Matrimony. Could the
          institution of marriage, already stretched to the breaking point and
          denigrated to the point of virtual irrelevance, survive the spectacle
          of separating and divorcing priests who are allowed to continue functioning
          as priests? But others would feel that automatic laicization would
          punish the priest for transgressions that were, in most cases, not
          entirely his own or for a tragedy that was not entirely his fault.
          And is any of us ready to hear this announcement from the pulpit: The
          special third collection today will be for our Alimony Fund? 
        It is a fact that most Christians see their clergy as men set apart,
          not quite "real people," regardless of the steps the minister
          or priest takes to counteract that view. This impression, strong in
          Protestant churches, is even stronger among Catholics, because Catholic
          priests are set apart by their ordination in a way Protestant ministers
          are not. This sense of separateness extends to the pastor's family.
          A minister's wife who is pregnant may find that church members are
          uncomfortable with her as a living symbol of the pastor's active sexuality;
          a minister's children often find the expectation that they will be
          models of good behavior, piety, and academic achievement a crushing
          burden. Close friendships within the church can prove impossible to
          establish, depriving the pastor's family of the bonds with other Christians
          so important to spiritual growth. The difference between the Protestant
          and Catholic understandings of ordination means that a priest's family
          would suffer this isolation to an even greater degree than a Protestant
          minister's family does. 
        In discussing the need for more vocations, it is easy to offer facile
          solutions, to say that many more young men would become priests if
          priests could be married. There is little evidence to support this
          contention; but even if it were true, the cure would be worse than
          the disease
         
        The unmarried man cares for the Lord's business; his aim is to please
          the Lord. But the married man cares for worldly things; his aim is
          to please his wife; and he has a divided mind. 1 Corinthians 7-32-33,
          NEB
        
        Original articles on Catholic faith, spirituality,
          prayer, apologetics and theology are welcomed.